Protectionism in a liquidity trap
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Liquidity Trap
The economic situation in a wide range of economies in the wake of the crisis that began in 2007 is characterised by many as a liquidity trap. The original conceptualization of the liquidity trap was part of Keynes’s (1936) theory of liquidity preference. It referred to a situation where the monetary authorities could not reduce the nominal long-term interest rate any further by selling bonds b...
متن کاملThe New-Keynesian Liquidity Trap
In standard solutions, the new-Keynesian model produces a deep recession with deflation in a liquidity trap. The model also makes unusual policy predictions: Useless government spending, technical regress, and capital destruction have large multipliers. These predictions become larger as prices become less sticky. I show that both data and policy predictions are strongly affected by equilibrium...
متن کاملLiquidity Deflation and Liquidity Trap under Flexible Prices
I discuss some simple microfoundations for Liquidity Deflation, a concept put forward in Calvo (2016 a and b), which can give rise to liquidity trap conditions under perfectly flexible prices. Unlike in Keynes (1936), this is a Supply Side Liquidity Trap. Moreover, modeling the policy interest rate as the rate of return on money-like instruments à la Calvo and Végh (1995), denoted by i!, I show...
متن کاملMonetary and Fiscal Policy In a Liquidity Trap
Confronting a prolonged period of slow growth, Japan has recently faced a difficult policy environment, with large budget deficits apparently precluding the use of traditional fiscal stimulus, and zero short-term interest rates apparently precluding the use of traditional monetary stimulus. This paper reconsiders each of these conclusions. In earlier work (Auerbach and Obstfeld 2004a,b), we out...
متن کاملThe Case for Open-Market Purchases in a Liquidity Trap
Prevalent thinking about liquidity traps suggests that the perfect substitutability of money and bonds at a zero short-term nominal interest rate renders open-market operations ineffective for achieving macroeconomic stabilization goals. We show that even were this the case, there remains a powerful argument for large-scale open market operations as a fiscal policy tool. As we also demonstrate,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Economics Letters
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0165-1765
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.06.023